Friday, June 15, 2007

Breaking the Reader Trance

When you write fiction, you're trying to induce a kind of hypnotic trance in your readers. A reader is sitting in her living room in a recliner in suburban Arkadelphia in the twenty-first century, but if your story works, she believes she's in a gravity chair in a space ship somewhere near Arcturus in the twenty-seventh century. You break the trance, and lose your reader, when anything in your words reminds her she's actually in Arkadelphia. If that's where she's going to be, she doesn't need your book.

What Breaks the Trance?


There are many ways to induce the reader trance, but even more ways to break it. Typos or grammatical errors may take your reader right back to Arkansas, especially if there's more than one per page. Or, if you force your reader to navigate long, boring descriptions or back-story, she may decide that even Arkadelphia is less boring.

Breaking point-of-view can also break the trance, especially with egregious breaks like, "Reader, you might think that Joachim is going to marry Sylvia, but watch out!" Or, you can accomplish the same sort of break by having a character do something sufficiently uncharacteristic. It may be shocking and interesting, but not without some justification.

Gross inaccuracies are sure trance-crackers. Yesterday, I was reading a mystery that put me in the California mountains in the 1940s, around Christmas. I was enjoying the well-constructed trance until the protagonist trudges through deep snow towards a mountain cabin and is startled by a brown bear emerging from the cabin's open door. I was startled, too—right out of my trance. I live in the mountains, and though I'm no bear expert, I do know that bears hibernate in the winter, even in California.

I Would Never Make Such an Ignorant Mistake


Completely out of the story's trance, I decided to return to my own story, the sequel to my novel, The Aremac Project. As it happened, I was editing a scene whose trance was also in the mountains (New Mexico, not California) around Christmas. I noticed that my character's car had just gone into a ditch trying to avoid a porcupine crossing the road. I breathed a sigh of relief that I hadn't chosen a bear—but my relief was only momentary. Do porcupine's hibernate? I hadn't thought of that, and maybe I was about to make the same stupid blunder that had just broken my own reader trance.

I know about bears because I often see them in the spring, stumbling out of hibernation. There's no mistaking the behavior of a bear who's not eaten for five or six months and staggers into a town full of large cans redolent of decaying garbage

But all my porcupine encounters have been in the summer, like the time Rose emerged from a bush with a nose full of quills. I could have worked around my ignorance by changing the porcupine to, say, a wolf. I know from direct experience that wolves roam around in the snow in the winter. But I had my own reasons why it had to be a porcupine. (You'll have to buy the book when it's published to find out why).

Is the Internet Reliable?


So, I required a source authoritative porcupine information. Naturally, turned to the internet and googled "porcupine" and "hibernate." On the first page, there were seven references that seemed to speak directly to the issue. Unfortunately, some said porcupines do not hibernate, but others said they do. So much for the internet as an authoritative source!

I had to dig deeper and find someone who had direct experience with porcupines. Fortunately, our local forest rangers were glad to oblige. Porcupines spend a lot of time huddled in winterized nests, but they don't hibernate—not in the sense that bears do. Sometimes they emerge from their nests and go wandering around on porcupine business, even when there's snow on the ground.

Surely, Direct Experience is Reliable


So, my scene's trance was safe. Or was it? Later in the scene, Marna, my heroine, stuck in the ditch, has to relieve the pressure in her bladder. Shyly, she creeps into the cold, dark woods, out of sight of any possible passersby. When the three women in my critique group (The Plotbusters) read this incident, they laughed. One said, "If it's dark, and snowing, and freezing, I don't go creeping into the woods to pee. One step outside of the pickup is all it takes."

I was puzzled. "But the scene is based on an actual experience. It's what actually happened when Dani and I, plus Keats and Chantal, were stuck in the ditch at midnight."

"Oh," said the Plotbusters, "but that's not the same. Marna is alone. You had two guys with the two women. Of course the women went into the woods."
Of course.

So, even direct experience can trap you, and break your reader's trance.

How About Science Fiction or Fantasy?


But surely you can get away with inaccuracies if you're writing science fiction or fantasy, can't you? After all, you're inventing the reality. If you want to have bears that don't hibernate and porcupines that do, you can make your world work that way. Just be sure you tip off the reader before the critical scene. As a writer, you don't have to think of these new realities in advance, but once you decide to put them in a scene, you'd better return to some earlier scene and add something to foreshadow the change. Perhaps one character says to another, "Oh, they may look like Earth bears, but they're different in a lot of ways. They lay eggs, don't nurse their young, and don't hibernate in our winter."

Inconsistencies


One other thing. If your bears lay eggs in one scene, they'd better not give birth to live young in another—unless you've foreshadowed that these alien bears do both. Inconsistencies take your reader right out of your fantasy world and back to their armchair reading a not-very-good book. That's what happened to me the other day when I read a far-future novel in which the mother spaceship is built to last for millions of years, self-repairing and able to build new bodies for human beings as well as new parts for itself plus millions of high-tech devices of all kinds. It carries a single planet-landing craft, which breaks a landing strut when the solitary pilot takes it down to the surface of a dangerous alien planet. He has no means of repairing the broken strut, so is stranded on the planet. And why is it the mother ship cannot build another landing craft?

Bah! The author hasn't done his job. Let's read something else.

Arbitrariness


It's fun to invent alien bears that lay eggs and don't hibernate. It's easy, too. In another recently trance-breaking novel, the alien creature had six heads, but its two mouths are in its buttocks, attached directly to its stomachs. Gee, I thought, I can do that. Let's see. My alien creature has seven heads, three mouths, one in its buttocks and two on its wings. Oh, did I mention that it had wings?

Yes, an author can make up all sorts of configurations, that sound "creative," but without a word or two of why this arrangement versus other arrangements, the whole story seems to me to have been generated by a computer using random numbers to select nouns and adjectives. Since no reason was given for six heads or mouths in the buttocks, I closed the book and went back to writing my own, determined to be a better hypnotist.

How about you, dear Reader? Do you have any trance-breakers to share?

6 comments:

Dwayne Phillips said...

One trance breaker for me is when an author drops in a mention of a disputed line of thinking as if everyone in the world agrees with it. For example, I was reading a book on strategic planning (a long story), and every now and then the author would drop in "and of course in the postmodern world this fill-in-the-blank is crucial."

"Postmodern world?" What is that? Are we in a Postmodern world? Says who? I did research on "postmodern world" and learned that most experts on the subject disagree on the definition. Many experts feel that the postmodern world has gone and we are now in the post-postmodern world.

With all this uncertainty, the author was ascribing certainty to the postmodern world.

Aargh!

I didn't make it through the first chapter of the book.

Well, I saved myself a lot of time and went on the better books.

Pat McGee said...

When the numbers don't add up...

John Grisham really messed this up for me in "The Firm." In one place, he describes the law firm as hiring one associate every two years or so. (page 4) In another, he says that the firm has 41 lawyers (also page 4). On page 10, he says that most partners retire before they're 50. So, what kind of a time warp do they have here? Compressing 82 years of recruiting into 20 years of service?

Detail Muse said...

Being a Myers-Briggs ISTJ, it seems writers would have a tough time keeping my trance going. So to enjoy fiction, I guess I’ve learned to let some things go. I do remember reading Walter Mosley’s “Little Scarlet,” specifically for its look at post-Watts 1960s Los Angeles. And I remember being yanked out of a couple of its hospital scenes -- one included IV bags, 10 or 20 years before the old glass IV bottles would have been replaced by vinyl bags.

And in Michael Connelly’s “The Narrows,” a character died a quick, asymptomatic death when in reality it would have been prolonged and full of external warning signs. It was essential to the plot that the death be quick, so this one rankled me more. I happened to be participating in a month-long online book discussion with Connelly at the time, and I voiced my concern. Connelly’s response was that a top doctor had “approved” it ... but at most, I think the doctor must have responded to an early, overall concept rather than as finally plotted.

Here’s an example of being distracted from a physics discussion.

Gerald M. Weinberg said...

All great examples, and helpful to me as a writer. I definitely need more detail muses in my reviewer network. Thanks, all, and let's have a few more. (It's kinda fun, eh?)

AlanAJ said...

Isn't what the reader believes just as important as (more important than) the truth?

You can be as accurate as you like, but if I think porcupines hibernate, seeing one wandering around in the snow is going to break my trance... unless you've softened me up beforehand.

Gerald M. Weinberg said...

alanaj wrote: "Isn't what the reader believes just as important as (more important than) the truth?"

Absolutely! And since readers' beliefs vary all over the place, you, the author, do have to set up the understanding that, say, porcupines don't hibernate.

And, you have to do it without insulting the intelligence of those readers who already know about porcupines.

And also you have to do it without any reader noticing that you're setting up a scene for later on.

Insults and obvious setups are two more ways to break the reader's trance.